Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.
In accordance with a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Although ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, countless viewers keep watching, even though oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a casino game that drew just 20,256 fans last week but attracted the average television audience of 1,114,000, according to ESPN.”
Schrotenboer continues on to say, “Just one bowl game this past year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers normally, according to Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game this past year involving the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Is it possible to imagine then the following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds its television studio strictly for the objective of hosting college bowl games. The tv screen network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In like that, it doesn’t have middleman to cope with for these additional events, eliminating having to negotiate with a separate facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway throughout the country.
Since this facility will be built as a tv studio and not being an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN will make attending the bowl game a genuine multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee along with the tv viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio might have just a limited quantity of seats, say 5,000 or less, which would minimize construction costs. The studio would not need to be much larger than the average college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough showing to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be a single bad seat in the house. You’d be assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate through the entire facility.
Because of the limited way to obtain seats, this might force ticket demand (and prices) up. You can forget 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities that are less than the usual quarter full. It would have been a 180-degree differ from the present experience, where many schools have to rely on daily deal sites to greatly help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit simply because they wouldn’t be required to choose the tens of thousands of tickets they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could make use of this facility multiple times throughout the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
For example, in 2010 five additional college football teams qualified for a dish that they certainly were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating countless dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers would rather be buying time on a tv program that a lot of viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also are interested – likely to a dish game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”